Site C not in public interest

Friday, May 23, 2014

The Province

Re: Approval of Site C project is in the public interest, Opinion, May 14
 
I strongly disagree with Charles Reid, president and CEO of BC Hydro. The proposed Site C dam on the Peace River may be a lot of things — mega boondoggle, waste of money, white elephant to name a few. But one thing you can’t call it is “in the public interest.”
 
B.C. is already losing a king’s ransom selling surplus electricity to an over-supplied out-of-province market that won’t pay us enough to break even. Now we are expected to believe spending $8 billion on the Site C dam to sell even more electricity at a loss is “in the public interest.” All this doesn’t even take into account the loss of family farms and First Nations heritage sites and hunting areas from flooding over 100 kilometres of valley-bottom lands.
 
The Site C dam project should be tossed, and the Peace River Valley protected as a nationally important agricultural and heritage treasure. That would be in the public interest.
 
JOE FOY, Wilderness Committee national campaign director, Vancouver
More from this campaign
A group of people marching down the street, protesting Kinder Morgan and the Trans Mountain pipeline. End of image description.
Anti Kinder Morgan Pipeline Protest Rally and March, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Photo credit: Michael Wheatley
Gas flaring in northeastern B.C. blankets the sky with black smoke.
Gas flaring in northeastern B.C. blankets the sky with black smoke. [Peter McCartney]
An aerial shot of Tilbury LNG. End of image description.
Tilbury LNG. WC Files.